Not only as volunteers but as human beings must we not regard our work as something commendable. By all means we ought to laud each other for various feats and deeds, but are we disposed to finding these among the quiet and often desperate moments of friendship, the fleeting acts which true neighbors express? Or, do we find the estimable, the meritorious, to be what society deems successes and achievements to be?
I am admittedly uncompetitive. I have upon rare occurrence experienced a competitive impetus which lasted longer than a flash, and which subsequently wielded me to compete for praise and honors. I share, however, that when successful, competent people find themselves for the first time as directors of a classroom, an easy and comfortable space we can revert to is one of competition. But with whom then does competition arise? If there seems a natural hierarchy in student-teacher relationships, I offer that maybe individuals elect to compete with themselves.
Something must also be said of culture and the classroom. For better and for worse, people cross cultures and do so perhaps needing approval and praise to redeem our work’s value. I haven’t studied Psychology at all, but I suspect that this is a screwy, cultural thing. I cede that in this experience and maybe in others like it, were there an empirical way to measure our achievements or successes, if that is what we really needed and wanted (beyond what we think we need and want, in the context of the actuality of real circumstances), it would only be self-serving – even if ultimately for the right reasons.
Expecting to benchmark a student’s or students’ progress if only to then attempt an internalization of said progress – as a skewed personal indicator or asset – is left-handed at best! Nevertheless, this auto-competition would have each of us step foot into the classroom and put our hand to mapping-out the student’s progress as a measure of us personally.
Students are not mirrors which tell us anything about how we are in the world. In fact, they are much more than this. They are like the shadows flickering on the cave wall in Plato´s Simile of the Cave: students can help forecast who we might choose to become. This does not involve our knowing at the end of the day just how much a student knows. That is tantamount to opting out of the gift of free relationship with the student. Are we building knowledge together in the classroom, or are we allowing students to know things?
This issue of auto-competition in the classroom pushes us reflect critically: why is it not enough to see “the wheels turn” upon viewing that look, that disposition which every teacher recognizes (and would be absurd to deny) as it overcomes the student’s face if not their entire being? That change in the student when the thought process begins and critical thinking explodes like a supernova behind the student’s eyes and in between his or her ears.
We do not gift the student things he or she must know in order to advance and to progress; we are teachers. Teaching on principle categorically negates pride and egotism. Why then, we might ask, do teachers continue to falter and commit these sins in the classroom? One answer is that we are human beings and prone to suffer even in the classroom from social ills such as these. The other answer is perhaps that we simply choose not to be the best that we can be, as good as the student deserves.
I propose that there is a solution to a somewhat inevitable auto-competition for volunteer teachers. Put out of your mind the idea that there is progress to be made. Why? Do so because you have faith in that there is progress to be made. Trust a little more in another human being´s ability to grow, and have a little understanding and compassion for the rational and thinking being’s ignorance which teems inside each one of us. Most of all, consider students and people to be more like photographic equipment and less like packing boxes in which to store things.
Consider the daguerreotype. The daguerreotype was the first commercially successful photographic machine. It would reflect an image onto a silvered copper plate, allowing the camera to make a direct positive on the plate. Using the Becquerel process, a heated pool of mercury exposed the silvered copper plate to mercury vapor creating what is believed to be a development of a silver and mercury alloy. The image is not stable and can be easily rubbed off by a finger and readily oxidizes. Just like progress with a student, the photo from the daguerreotype is an exposure, not a permanent etching.
Will a student remember everything? Will I remember every detail of a photo I took some while ago? The answer is: probably not. So it is absurd to think a child will recall a cached bit of knowledge and often think privately, Oh, I rather enjoyed that success we achieved with learning in the classroom! If some agree that this problem exists in the classroom and that we create it so, but yet disagree with the proposed solution, well, why don’t we ask whether or not our students hope we view them, treat them and consider them as our barometers for personal successes and achievements? We don’t ask this because we were students (and are) and we know the answer. And we know how that question would make us feel. We cannot afford to teach while conflating our desire to succeed with a dedication not to fail.
Let us not take the magic out of learning and turn learning into a paucity of what we think we can weigh as a testament to our own prides, a gauge of how far each of us have come in our volunteer experience as teachers. Rather, let us look forward hopefully and let us imagine the state the world would be in if we worked through things together, and if students knew we were in their corner always, forever willing to work through things with them. Adults, we, would not feel like we had to go out into the world to achieve success and combat failures on our own. We wouldn’t feel this plight because we would have no cause to believe that we were alone in our successes and failures, accomplishments and achievements. That wouldn’t be the game we play; we might actually start to view the world as a community, to laud each other for various feats and deeds that we readily find among the quiet and often desperate moments of friendship, and the fleeting acts of true neighbors. In this way, teaching or not, we would already have it all, and every possible accolade would be at our doorsteps immediately. This would be the achievement of our lifetimes.